मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि च दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… इ. स. 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Thursday, July 17, 2025

मार्सेल प्रूस्ट, मर्ढेकर आणि उपटतां स्तन हाले...Mardhekar's Poem, Breasts and Marathi Literary Critics

 Marcel Proust, 'In Search of Lost Time', 1913-1927:  "...And so it is with our own past. It is a labour in vain to attempt to recapture it: all the efforts of our intellect must prove futile. The past is hidden somewhere outside the realm, beyond the reach of intellect, in some material object (in the sensation which that material object will give us) which we do not suspect. And as for that object, it depends on chance whether we come upon it or not before we ourselves must die.

Many years had elapsed during which nothing of Combray, save what was comprised in the theatre and the drama of my going to bed there, had any existence for me, when one day in winter, as I came home, my mother, seeing that I was cold, offered me some tea, a thing I did not ordinarily take. I declined at first, and then, for no particular reason, changed my mind. She sent out for one of those short, plump little cakes called ‘petites madeleines,’ which look as though they had been moulded in the fluted scallop of a pilgrim’s shell. And soon, mechanically, weary after a dull day with the prospect of a depressing morrow, I raised to my lips a spoonful of the tea in which I had soaked a morsel of the cake. No sooner had the warm liquid, and the crumbs with it, touched my palate than a shudder ran through my whole body, and I stopped, intent upon the extraordinary changes that were taking place. An exquisite pleasure had invaded my senses, but individual, detached, with no suggestion of its origin. And at once the vicissitudes of life had become indifferent to me, its disasters innocuous, its brevity illusory — this new sensation having had on me the effect which love has of filling me with a precious essence; or rather this essence was not in me, it was myself. I had ceased now to feel mediocre, accidental, mortal. Whence could it have come to me, this all-powerful joy? I was conscious that it was connected with the taste of tea and cake, but that it infinitely transcended those savours, could not, indeed, be of the same nature as theirs. Whence did it come? What did it signify? How could I seize upon and define it?..."

 

E O Wilson: "Our greatest weakness, however, is our pitifully small sense of taste and smell. Over 99 percent of all living species, from microorganisms to animals, rely on chemical senses to find their way through the environment. They have also perfected the capacity to communicate with one another with special chemicals called pheromones. In contrast, human beings, along with monkeys, apes, and birds, are among the rare life forms that are primarily audiovisual, and correspondingly weak in taste and smell. We are idiots compared with rattlesnakes and bloodhounds. Our poor ability to smell and taste is reflected in the small size of our chemosensory vocabularies, forcing us for the most part to fall back on similes and other forms of metaphor. A wine has a delicate bouquet, we say, its taste is full and somewhat fruity. A scent is like that of a rose, or pine, or rain newly fallen on the earth.

We are forced to stumble through our chemically challenged lives in a chemosensory biosphere, relying on sound and vision that evolved primarily for life in the trees. Only through science and technology has humanity penetrated the immense sensory worlds in the rest of the biosphere. With instrumentation, we are able to translate the sensory worlds of the rest of life into our own. And in the process, we have learned to see almost to the end of the universe, and estimated the time of its beginning. We will never orient by feeling Earth’s magnetic field, or sing in pheromone, but we can bring all such information existing into our own little sensory realm."

Vladimir Nabokov:   “Nothing revives the past so completely as a smell that was once associated with it”

  म. वा. धोंड त्यांच्या 'तरीहि येतो वास फुलांना' या पुस्तकात 'बोंड कपाशीचें फुटे' या लेखात (पृष्ठ ११३-१२७, १९९९) बा सी मर्ढेकरांच्या 'बोंड कपाशीचें फुटे' या ५५ कवितेची (पृष्ठ ६४, मर्ढेकरांची कविता) मीमांसा करतात. 

 

"बोंड कपाशीचे फुटे,                                                  
उले वेचतांना ऊर;                                                     
आज होईल का गोड                                                 
माझ्या हाताची भाकर !                                          

भरे भुइमूग-दाणा,
उपटतां स्तन हाले;
 
आज येतील का मोड
माझ्या वालांना चांगले !

वांगी झाली काळीं-निळीं,
कांटा बोचे काढतांना;
आज होतील का खुशी

माणसं गं जेवताना ! "
 
धोंड म्हणतात मार्सेल प्रूस्ट  प्रमाणे मर्ढेकरांना त्यांचा बालपणाचा काळ  आणि त्यात पाहिलेली कपाशी, भुईमूग व भाज्यांची शेती (वरील तीन कडव्यांत अनुक्रमे आणलेली) आठवली , अनेक स्नेहाच्या घरातील भाकरी  भाजण्याचे वास घेऊन. 
 
मला हे जरा अतिशयोक्त वाटले. तेवढ्यासाठी प्रूस्ट का जागवलेत?
 
 प्रूस्ट च्या पुस्तकातील वर दिलेला परिच्छेद वाचा. केवढ्या खोलात गेलाय प्रूस्ट आपल्या आणिआपल्या भूतकाळाच्या संबंधांबाबत... प्रूस्टचे पुढचे परिच्छेद तर स्कुबा डाइव्ह मारतात! 
 
शास्त्रज्ञ विल्सन म्हणतात की इतर प्राणी जगताच्या तुलनेत आपली घ्राणेंद्रिये किती दुबळी आहेत.

 प्रूस्ट बद्दल बोलायचे तर, मर्ढेकरांनी साधी एक दीर्घ कविता सुद्धा लिहली नाही, त्यांच्या आवडत्या ऑडेन किंवा इलियट सारखी,  
 
मर्ढेकरांपेक्षा वास आणि आठवण यावर जी ए कुलकर्णींनी कितीतरी जास्त लिहले आहे पण धोंडांना त्यांचे वावडे असावे! त्यांच्या एकाही पुस्तकात जीए यांचा उल्लेख मी तरी वाचला नाहीये. 
 
मराठीतील धोंडांनी उधृत केलेले समीक्षक वाचून (संभोग काय , गर्भवती काय , निपुत्रिकपणा काय, मीलन काय, वक्ष काय !)  तर वाटते  कविता किती दुर्बोध आहे... सुदैवाने धोंड ती- माझ्या मते यौग्य -अशी सोपी करतात. 
 

 

Artist : (probably) Hawaldar

Monday, July 14, 2025

Thursday, July 10, 2025

सपाट, नाजुक, नखरेबाज/ बिलगुन गेल्या किती चंपल्या;...Vincent van Gogh, Shoes

 

माझ्या लहानपणी दाराबाहेर किंवा घरात काढून ठेवलेल्या चपला हा एक मोठा विषय असे... (त्याचे महत्वाचे कारण घराच्या उत्पन्नाच्या तुलनेत चपला अत्यंत महाग असत)

माझे वडील मिरजेत १९६८ च्या सुमारास इंग्लिश चा क्लास कॉलेजमधील विद्यार्थ्यांसाठी (अनेक मुले आणि मुली) आमच्या घरीच माडीवर काही काळ घेत असत... काही वेळा प्राथमिक शाळेतील मी "मजा" म्हणून त्या घरात काढून ठेवलेल्या चपला मिक्स करून टाकत असे ... 
 
आणि ते जरी केले नाही तरी चपला न्याहाळणे काही वेळा होत असे - झिजलेल्या, कधी रंगीत, कधी किंचित high हिल्स , काही नाजूक, नव्या, जुन्या , विटलेल्या, काही अंगठा तुटलेल्या.. 
 
मर्ढेकरांच्या भाषेत:
 
"... सपाट, नाजुक, नखरेबाज
बिलगुन गेल्या किती चंपल्या;
किती रांगडी ठसकेदार
वहाण गेली दावित टिकल्या !..."
 
('फलाटदादा, फलाटदादा', पृष्ठ ४७, मर्ढेकरांची कविता, १९५९/१९७७)
 
फलाटदादा सारखे हे आमच्या घराच्या उंबरठ्याला विचारता आले असते!
 
पिंगळावेळ, १९७७ चा एपिग्राफ आहे:
 
"तीर्थरूप आबांस,
डोळे उघडुन उठून बसत मी तुम्हाला नीट
पाहण्यापूर्वीच तुमची पाउले उंबऱ्याबाहेर
पडली होती."
 
त्या पावलांनी घातलेली पादत्राणे यावर मी एक ब्लॉग पोस्ट जुलै २९ २०१५ रोजी लिहली होती...
 
अशीच पादत्राणांची एक जोड कलेच्या इतिहासात अमर झाली आहेत.. 
 
"An acquaintance of Van Gogh’s in Paris described how he bought old work shoes at a flea market. Vincent then walked through the mud in them until they were filthy. Only then did he feel they were interesting enough to paint."
 
Vincent van Gogh, Shoes (1886)
 

 
 

Wednesday, July 09, 2025

Guru Dutt@100

 माझे वडील राज कपूर चे भक्त, आमच्या घरात सारखे राज कपूर चे कौतुक चाले , ते बऱ्याच प्रमाणात मला सुद्धा पटायचे कारण मी त्यांचे अनेक सिनेमे पहिले होते... 

पण १९७७ नंतर , केंव्हातरी , सांगलीमध्ये 'प्यासा' बघितला आणि त्यातील "हम आपकी आंखों में..." गाण्याचे सोंदर्य पाहून जाणवले की हे काही वेगळेच मिश्रण आहे .... हे गाणे घर आय मेरा परदेशी पेक्षा सुद्धा मोठे आहे ... 

(The cinematographer for the classic Hindi film "Pyaasa" (1957), directed by Guru Dutt, was V.K. Murthy. He is renowned for his exceptional work in Indian cinema and is often credited with pioneering the use of lighting and shadows in Hindi films. His collaboration with Guru Dutt in "Pyaasa" is considered iconic, contributing significantly to the film's timeless appeal and visual poetry.)

("Guru Dutt believed in using minimal instrumental pieces in songs, and ‘Jaane woh kaise’ does not have a prelude. As is the case with the other songs in Pyaasa (except ‘Sar jo tera chakraye’ and ‘Hum aapki ankhon mein’), background music in the song is sparse. All that is heard are piano notes and mild strains of the organ, with the minimal engagement of instruments allowing the voice to soar. The piano notes are prominent but the instrument is surprisingly nowhere in sight. Did Dutt mean to show a piano in the sequence or was Burman-da given to believe that there would be one?"...

Anirudha Bhattacharjee & Balaji Vittal 'Gaata Rahe Mera Dil: 50 Classic Hindi Film Songs', 2015)

 


 आणि सगळ्यात महत्वाचे म्हणजे दिग्दर्शक सांगत होते , हे सगळे क्षणिक आहे , स्वप्न आहे , सगळे संपणार  आहे  ... 

मला ते नट म्हणून कधीच मोठे वाटले नाहीत पण त्यांनी दिग्दर्शित केलेले सिनेमे बाझी, आर पार , मिस्टर अँड मिसेस ५५, सीआय डी हे बघताना जाणवले की ह्याचा दिग्दर्शक मोठा कलावंत आहे ... 

Saturday, July 05, 2025

Aesop's Fables Are the Alphabet of Humanity- G. K Chesterton Vs. WSJ

Sam Sacks reviewed 'Aesop's Fables: A New Translation ' for WSJ in Oct 2024.

It said: "...“Aesop is not a good book for reformers,” a critic once observed, and it’s true that the fables present our natures and social standings as essentially fixed. Foxes are foxy, wolves predatory, mice timid. Trying to be what you are not, like “The Donkey in a Lion’s Skin,” brings about a fall. The lion is the king of the beasts and many fables are about the foolishness of hoping to challenge its authority. There is no democratic, much less revolutionary, spirit here. With rare exceptions, self-sacrifice is merely another example of naiveté. 

What the fables offer instead is a wintry, fatalistic kind of knowledge. Mr. Waterfield writes that they were intended for popular audiences, meaning powerless people who could expect no change in their fortunes and might take consolation in seeing the world without illusions and laughing at its inanities. In dark times, I’m glad to have them, but I’ll keep my copy on the top shelf of the bookcase, out of reach of little hands."

The reviewer clearly wants to see the world reformed with every other book!\

G. K Chesterton (1874-1936) too wrote about the fables:

"...But by using animals in this austere and arbitrary style as they are used on the shields of heraldry or the hieroglyphics of the ancients, men have really succeeded in handing down those tremendous truths that are called truisms. If the chivalric lion be red and rampant, it is rigidly red and rampant; if the sacred ibis stands anywhere on one leg, it stands on one leg for ever. In this language, like a large animal alphabet, are written some of the first philosophic certainties of men. As the child learns A for Ass or B for Bull or C for Cow, so man has learnt here to connect the simpler and stronger creatures with the simpler and stronger truths. That a flowing stream cannot befoul its own fountain, and that any one who says it does is a tyrant and a liar; that a mouse is too weak to fight a lion, but too strong for the cords that can hold a lion; that a fox who gets most out of a flat dish may easily get least out of a deep dish; that the crow whom the gods forbid to sing, the gods nevertheless provide with cheese; that when the goat insults from a mountain-top it is not the goat that insults, but the mountain; all these are deep truths deeply graven on the rocks wherever men have passed. It matters nothing how old they are, or how new; they are the alphabet of humanity, which like so many forms of primitive picture-writing employs any living symbol in preference to man. These ancient and universal tales are all of animals; as the latest discoveries in the oldest prehistoric caverns are all of animals. Man, in his simpler stories, always felt that he himself was something too mysterious to be drawn. But the legend he carved under these cruder symbols was everywhere the same; and whether fables began with Aesop or began with Adam, whether they were German and medieval as Reynard the Fox, or as French and Renaissance as La Fontaine, the upshot is everywhere essentially the same; that pride goes before a fall; and that there is such a thing as being too clever by half. You will not find any other legend but this written upon the rocks by any hand of man. There is every type and time of fable; but there is only one moral to the fable; because there is only one moral to everything."

 A detail of a Greek ceramic vase showing a fox teaching fables to the writer Aesop, ca. 400 B.C