मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… . . 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Thursday, July 17, 2025

मार्सेल प्रूस्ट, मर्ढेकर आणि उपटतां स्तन हाले...Mardhekar's Poem, Breasts and Marathi Literary Critics

 Marcel Proust, 'In Search of Lost Time', 1913-1927:  "...And so it is with our own past. It is a labour in vain to attempt to recapture it: all the efforts of our intellect must prove futile. The past is hidden somewhere outside the realm, beyond the reach of intellect, in some material object (in the sensation which that material object will give us) which we do not suspect. And as for that object, it depends on chance whether we come upon it or not before we ourselves must die.

Many years had elapsed during which nothing of Combray, save what was comprised in the theatre and the drama of my going to bed there, had any existence for me, when one day in winter, as I came home, my mother, seeing that I was cold, offered me some tea, a thing I did not ordinarily take. I declined at first, and then, for no particular reason, changed my mind. She sent out for one of those short, plump little cakes called ‘petites madeleines,’ which look as though they had been moulded in the fluted scallop of a pilgrim’s shell. And soon, mechanically, weary after a dull day with the prospect of a depressing morrow, I raised to my lips a spoonful of the tea in which I had soaked a morsel of the cake. No sooner had the warm liquid, and the crumbs with it, touched my palate than a shudder ran through my whole body, and I stopped, intent upon the extraordinary changes that were taking place. An exquisite pleasure had invaded my senses, but individual, detached, with no suggestion of its origin. And at once the vicissitudes of life had become indifferent to me, its disasters innocuous, its brevity illusory — this new sensation having had on me the effect which love has of filling me with a precious essence; or rather this essence was not in me, it was myself. I had ceased now to feel mediocre, accidental, mortal. Whence could it have come to me, this all-powerful joy? I was conscious that it was connected with the taste of tea and cake, but that it infinitely transcended those savours, could not, indeed, be of the same nature as theirs. Whence did it come? What did it signify? How could I seize upon and define it?..."

 

E O Wilson: "Our greatest weakness, however, is our pitifully small sense of taste and smell. Over 99 percent of all living species, from microorganisms to animals, rely on chemical senses to find their way through the environment. They have also perfected the capacity to communicate with one another with special chemicals called pheromones. In contrast, human beings, along with monkeys, apes, and birds, are among the rare life forms that are primarily audiovisual, and correspondingly weak in taste and smell. We are idiots compared with rattlesnakes and bloodhounds. Our poor ability to smell and taste is reflected in the small size of our chemosensory vocabularies, forcing us for the most part to fall back on similes and other forms of metaphor. A wine has a delicate bouquet, we say, its taste is full and somewhat fruity. A scent is like that of a rose, or pine, or rain newly fallen on the earth.

We are forced to stumble through our chemically challenged lives in a chemosensory biosphere, relying on sound and vision that evolved primarily for life in the trees. Only through science and technology has humanity penetrated the immense sensory worlds in the rest of the biosphere. With instrumentation, we are able to translate the sensory worlds of the rest of life into our own. And in the process, we have learned to see almost to the end of the universe, and estimated the time of its beginning. We will never orient by feeling Earth’s magnetic field, or sing in pheromone, but we can bring all such information existing into our own little sensory realm."

Vladimir Nabokov:   “Nothing revives the past so completely as a smell that was once associated with it”

  म. वा. धोंड त्यांच्या 'तरीहि येतो वास फुलांना' या पुस्तकात 'बोंड कपाशीचें फुटे' या लेखात (पृष्ठ ११३-१२७, १९९९) बा सी मर्ढेकरांच्या 'बोंड कपाशीचें फुटे' या ५५ कवितेची (पृष्ठ ६४, मर्ढेकरांची कविता) मीमांसा करतात. 

 

"बोंड कपाशीचे फुटे,                                                  
उले वेचतांना ऊर;                                                     
आज होईल का गोड                                                 
माझ्या हाताची भाकर !                                          

भरे भुइमूग-दाणा,
उपटतां स्तन हाले;
 
आज येतील का मोड
माझ्या वालांना चांगले !

वांगी झाली काळीं-निळीं,
कांटा बोचे काढतांना;
आज होतील का खुशी

माणसं गं जेवताना ! "
 
धोंड म्हणतात मार्सेल प्रूस्ट  प्रमाणे मर्ढेकरांना त्यांचा बालपणाचा काळ  आणि त्यात पाहिलेली कपाशी, भुईमूग व भाज्यांची शेती (वरील तीन कडव्यांत अनुक्रमे आणलेली) आठवली , अनेक स्नेहाच्या घरातील भाकरी  भाजण्याचे वास घेऊन. 
 
मला हे जरा अतिशयोक्त वाटले. तेवढ्यासाठी प्रूस्ट का जागवलेत?
 
 प्रूस्ट च्या पुस्तकातील वर दिलेला परिच्छेद वाचा. केवढ्या खोलात गेलाय प्रूस्ट आपल्या आणिआपल्या भूतकाळाच्या संबंधांबाबत... प्रूस्टचे पुढचे परिच्छेद तर स्कुबा डाइव्ह मारतात! 
 
शास्त्रज्ञ विल्सन म्हणतात की इतर प्राणी जगताच्या तुलनेत आपली घ्राणेंद्रिये किती दुबळी आहेत.

 प्रूस्ट बद्दल बोलायचे तर, मर्ढेकरांनी साधी एक दीर्घ कविता सुद्धा लिहली नाही, त्यांच्या आवडत्या ऑडेन किंवा इलियट सारखी,  
 
मर्ढेकरांपेक्षा वास आणि आठवण यावर जी ए कुलकर्णींनी कितीतरी जास्त लिहले आहे पण धोंडांना त्यांचे वावडे असावे! त्यांच्या एकाही पुस्तकात जीए यांचा उल्लेख मी तरी वाचला नाहीये. 
 
मराठीतील धोंडांनी उधृत केलेले समीक्षक वाचून (संभोग काय , गर्भवती काय , निपुत्रिकपणा काय, मीलन काय, वक्ष काय !)  तर वाटते  कविता किती दुर्बोध आहे... सुदैवाने धोंड ती- माझ्या मते यौग्य -अशी सोपी करतात. 
 

 

Artist : (probably) Hawaldar