मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… . . 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Saturday, October 01, 2022

Immense Panorama of Futility and Anarchy...Thirsting for Redemption and Renewal...The Waste Land@100

Michiko Kakutani, ‘Ex Libris: 100+ Books to Read and Reread’, 2020:

“…After decades of being taught in high school and college, after its innovations have been widely assimilated, imitated, and satirized, The Waste Land might now strike some readers as familiar, even trite. It’s hard to appreciate just how radical it was when it was first published, breaking old rules of prosody and using new language and techniques to tackle what were then unfashionable themes of spiritual alienation and urban malaise.

But reread today, the poem’s evocation of the broken world left in the wake of World War I remains remarkably resonant. It depicts a world in which the old rules and certainties have vanished—a spiritual desert where “the dead tree gives no shelter,” where lonely people move numbly through an “Unreal City,” where the poet “can connect / Nothing with nothing.”

Eliot once observed that the poem was written as “the relief of a personal…grouse against life,” and it was, in part, a reflection of his own state of mind as he struggled with a miserable marriage and a nervous breakdown. But much the way that Kafka’s work, which was rooted in his relationship with a domineering father, yielded lasting metaphors for modern life and politics, so did Eliot’s Waste Land mirror larger dynamics in the world. It’s a world not unlike our own, haunted by a sense of loss and dislocation—a world, to use words written by Eliot in an essay about Ulysses, that presented an “immense panorama of futility and anarchy” while thirsting for redemption and renewal.”

Robert Crawford, 'Young Eliot: From St. Louis to The Waste Land', 2015:

“…It was 15 December when The Waste Land became an American book. One thousand copies were printed, each stamped with an individual number, published from 105 W. 40th Street, New York. Hard at work assembling the contents for the next few issues of the Criterion, Tom opened the small, pale-jacketed volume in his London flat. Slightly heavier than it looked, underneath the dust jacket it was bound in black boards with only the words THE WASTE LAND in gold on the front board. Inside, the poem now carried its Latin and Greek epigraph (though no dedication), and was printed in large type – never more than sixteen lines of poetry per page. Thanks to this generous spacing and to the added prose ballast of the Notes, it managed to fill sixty-four pages. Throughout, the verse carried line numbers (one every ten lines), as if to bind together a work that kept threatening to explode into separate shards. The inside front-jacket flap quoted an early review by Burton Rascoe in the New York Tribune, calling The Waste Land ‘a thing of bitterness and beauty’ and, ‘perhaps, the finest poem of this generation’. The note on the rear flap began simply, ‘T. S. Eliot was born in 1888 in St. Louis, Missouri’, then went on to hail him as ‘without question the most significant of the younger American writers’. Tom, weary and very far from the city of his birth, looked at the name ‘T. S. Eliot’ in plain black print on the title page.

It was as if he had never been young.”



 

Wednesday, September 28, 2022

इरावती कर्वे यांची दोन दर्शने : दुर्गाबाई आणि पुल....Irawati Karve - Two Perspectives by Durga Bhagwat, Pu La Deshpande

२०१८साली मला पुलंची खालील पुस्तके आवडतात: 
तुझे आहे तुजपाशी १९५७, नस्ती उठाठेव १९५२, रवींद्रनाथ : तीन व्याख्याने १९८० आणि गुण गाईन आवडी १९७५.

'गु. गा. आ.'  मधील काही लेख माझ्यासाठी मी कोणत्याही भाषेत वाचलेल्या सर्वोत्कृष्ट लेखांपैकी आहेत- उदा वसंत पवार, वसंतराव देशपांडें, कुमार गंधर्व यांच्या वरील लेख. वसंत पवारांना पुल काहीकाळासाठी अक्षरशः जिवंत करतात. महाराष्ट्राची संगीतातील श्रीमंती आपल्याला अशा लेखांतून जाणवते.

 पण मला त्यांचा इरावती कर्वेंवरचा लेख अजिबात आवडला नाही. अगदी उथळ वाटला.

आणि त्याच्या उलट इरावती कर्वेंवरचा दुर्गा भागवतांचा लेख. पुलंचा सामान्य लेख जिथे संपतो तिथे दुर्गाबाईंचा सुरु होतो. पुल जी उंची त्यांच्या वर उल्लेखिलेल्या चांगल्या लेखात गाठतात ती दुर्गाबाई ह्या लेखात गाठतात.

मला ह्या गोष्टीच वाईट वाटत आलय की गुणग्राहक पुलंनी दुर्गाबाईंच्या महानतेबद्दल विस्ताराने लिहल नाही. विलास सारंगांनी विस्ताराने केलेले दुर्गाबाईंचे कौतुक वाचल्यानंतर हे शल्य वाढलय.

 दुर्गाबाई ह्या माझ्यामते २०व्या शतकातील सर्वोत्तम मराठी लेखक (आणि जगातील सर्वोत्कृष्टांमध्ये एक) होत्या. त्यांचे गुणवर्णन करून आपण आपली उंची वाढवत असतो. 


डावीकडली पान : "आठवले तसे", १९९१ , कृतज्ञता : दुर्गाबाईंच्या साहित्याचे कॉपीराईट होल्डर्स
उजवीकडील पान : गुण गाईन आवडी, कृतज्ञता: मौज प्रकाशन आणि पुलंच्या साहित्याचे कॉपीराईट होल्डर्स

Sunday, September 25, 2022

Like Kilroy, William Faulkner Too Was Here....

#WilliamFaulkner125
 
William Faulkner turns 125 today, September 25 2022


 “Life is not interested in good and evil. Don Quixote was constantly choosing between good and evil, but then he was choosing in his dream state. He was mad. He entered reality only when he was so busy trying to cope with people that he had no time to distinguish between good and evil. Since people exist only in life, they must devote their time simply to being alive. Life is motion, and motion is concerned with what makes man move—which is ambition, power, pleasure. What time a man can devote to morality, he must take by force from the motion of which he is a part. He is compelled to make choices between good and evil sooner or later, because moral conscience demands that from him in order that he can live with himself tomorrow. His moral conscience is the curse he had to accept from the gods in order to gain from them the right to dream....


...The aim of every artist is to arrest motion, which is life, by artificial means and hold it fixed so that a hundred years later, when a stranger looks at it, it moves again since it is life. Since man is mortal, the only immortality possible for him is to leave something behind him that is immortal since it will always move. This is the artist’s way of scribbling “Kilroy was here” on the wall of the final and irrevocable oblivion through which he must someday pass.” —

 

Youth Drawings (1916-1925)

Artist: William Faulkner

Thursday, September 22, 2022

Simply To See...

 John Gray, “Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals”:

 “SIMPLY TO SEE: Other animals do not need a purpose in life. A contradiction to itself, the human animal cannot do without one. Can we not think of the aim of life as being simply to see?”

 

illustration for "House And Garden" magazine, 1925 by  André Édouard Marty (1882 - 1974)