मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… . . 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Tuesday, December 06, 2022

That Animal Is Screwed: Walton Ford's Paintings of Paintings of Animals


Lucy Jakub, NYRB, December 2018:
".....It was the lion known to the Roman, British, and French empires, and the one that MGM took as its dynamic logo—the king of beasts, which for all of Western civilization has embodied strength, courage, and nobility. But it’s a doubtful honor; as Ford has put it, “when humans become stalker/lovers of a certain animal, that animal is screwed.”
Each painting in the series is based on an encounter, historical or imagined, between lions and people. Continuing a long preoccupation of Ford’s, these often have an overt anti-colonialist and anti-imperialist edge that is poignantly mirrored in the dynamic between humans and their animal conquests. Ford punctures Jean-Léon Gérôme’s sensational depictions of the Venatio in the Circus Maximus with MVNERA, which shows a lion cowering in the elevator shaft that brought animals into the arena...."



The Christians’ Last Prayer in the Circus Maximus, 1883

Artist: Jean Leon Gerome (1824–1904)


Artist: Walton Ford, 2018 

Friday, December 02, 2022

मराठी माणूस संगीतामध्ये उत्तम रंगतो. चित्रांच्यामध्ये फारच कमी...Frustration of Marathi Cover Artists

Simon Garfield :
"The cliché that you can’t judge a book by its cover is wrong. You clearly can and all you need is a book of cover jackets to prove the nonsense of that phrase."

I wrote about the following cover dated September 1946  by Dinanath Dalal, on the Facebook page dedicated to him, here.

courtesy: Vangmay Shobha magazine and Bookganga.com

I have neither heard of the book nor its author Mr. Shridhar Deshpande (श्रीधर देशपांडे) but I found the cover stunning.

Now will it be fair if the book does not mention its cover artist?

Indeed, if quizzed, I will struggle to point out a few good books published in Marathi in 1940's (1941-1950) but I find some stunning work done by Maharashtra's illustrators and cover artists like Dalal, Godse, Mulgaonkar during the same period.

I bought C. V. Joshi's (चिं. वि. जोशी) book 'Sanchar' (संचार), first published in 1945, on March 28 2010.

I was surprised by the cover. It did not look like the one that was done in 1945. There is no mention of cover artist any where in the book.

By the way, I have seen dozens of Marathi books, by the established writers and the publication houses where there is NO mention of cover artist.

courtesy: copyright holders of the art work

But I was wrong. It was done in 1945.

By some coincidence, I found the same picture on the cover of a (now defunct) Marathi magazine 'Vangmay Shobha' (वाङ्मय शोभा) dated December 1945, the same year the book was first published.


courtesy: the artist, Vangmay-Shobha and Bookganga

Once again there is NO mention of the artist in the magazine. There is just this note by the editor.


But Rajiv Dole (राजीव डोळे) helped confirm in January 2017 that the artist was Dinanath Dalal (दीनानाथ दलाल).... just look at the center-left of the picture, on the road, just below the feet of human figures....there is that very distinctive  signature of Dalal.

Now I will quote substantially from my post on this blog dated September 25 2013.

The late Mr. Vasant Sarwate (वसंत सरवटे) writes in Marathi (मराठी) magazine Lalit (ललित) September 2013:

"...in summation, it can be said that Marathi person enjoys auditory experience more than visual experience An average Marathi person engrosses in music very well. Very little in pictures. Almost none. It's certainly true of ordinary people. But even those writers, poets and critics who are celebrated in Marathi literature, are well known for their talent can't see pictures on the cover and those (if they exist) inside. Let the book be of the other authors' or their own ! Then appreciating them remains a remote thing..."

("...एकूणात, मराठी माणसाला दृश्यापेक्षा श्राव्य अनुभव अधिक भावतात, असं म्हणता येईल. सामान्य मराठी माणूस संगीतामध्ये उत्तम रंगतो. चित्रांच्यामध्ये फारच कमी. जवळजवळ नाहीच. सर्वसामान्यांच्या बाबतीत  तर हे खर आहेच. पण मराठीमध्ये साहित्याचे जाणकार म्हणून किर्ती मिळवलेल्या , प्रतिभावंत म्हणून मान्यता प्राप्त झालेल्या लेखक, कवी, टीकाकार यांना मुखपृष्ठावरच आणि (असतील तर) पुस्तकाच्या आतील चित्र दिसतच नाहीत. पुस्तक इतर लेखकांचे असो किंवा त्याचं स्वतःच असो ! मग त्यांचा आस्वाद घेण तर दूरच...")
 
 The late G A Kulkarni (जी ए कुलकर्णी) himself was an accomplished painter and has written about visual arts in his numerous letters that are now published.

The edition of his 'Ramalkhuna' (रमलखुणा), 1975/ 1988,  that I have, has this cover: 


This edition is published by Mr. Ramdas Bhatkal's (रामदास भटकळ) Popular Prakashan. The book does not mention the cover artist!

Mr. Bhatkal  was a friend of the late Mr. Prabhakar Goray (प्रभाकर गोरे) who has done covers of many of GA's books. He has has written an essay on Goray- length 15 pages- in his book: 'Jigsaw: study in friendship', 1997/1998 ('जिगसॉ: स्टडी इन फ्रेंडशिप' , १९९७/१९९८).

Mr. Bhatkal states in his essay: "...पण हे खंर की  आज जीएंची पुस्तकं जी वाचकांच्या मनात ठसली आहेत त्यात गोरेची चित्रही सामील आहेत..."

Tuesday, November 29, 2022

"माझा प्रवास" मधली स्त्री आणि (एकेकाळील) मराठी अंकांवरील स्त्रीया...Godse Bhatji's Fear, Sweaty Woman and Cover Girls


On Feb 27 2016, I wondered when I might see Godse Bhatji's 'Maza Pravas' (माझा प्रवास) on Marathi TV. 

In that post, I quoted two paragraphs from Godse's book to highlight the kind of drama, thrill and even sex the book has.

One of them is about a tight embrace of an unknown young woman, Godse is forced to get into,  as both of them flee from the violence.

"...कोठें आवाज होत नाहीं अशी संधी पाहून बंड्यांतून बाहेर पडलो. धांवत धांवत विहिरीवर येऊन मडकें फासास लावून झराझर पाणी काढलें व मडकें तोंडास लाविलें. घोट दोन घोट पाणी घशाखालीं उतरतें न उतरतें इतक्यांत जवळच्या वाड्यांत बंदुकीचा आवाज कानीं पडला. जीवाची आशा मनुष्यास कधीही सुटत नाही. मडकें हातांतून टांकून धांव ठोकली तों घोंटाळून जाऊन आमचे बंड्याचा रस्ता चुकलों. तेंव्हां माझे हातपाय कापूं लागले व सैरावैरा इकडेतिकडे घाबरून धांवत सुटलो, इतक्यांत एका बंड्याचें तोंड दृष्टींस पडले. त्यांत डोंके घालून शिरण्यांस लागलों तों आंत दोघी तरुण बायका दृष्टींस पडल्या. त्यांनीही मोठ्यां घाईने आंत लवकर या असें सांगितलेंं. तो बंड्या फार लहान असल्यामुळें आंत दोघां बायकांसहित पुरेशी जागा बसण्यांस नव्हती. परंतु त्या कोमल अंत:करणाच्या स्त्रियांनी अडचण सोसून मला आंत घेतलें. त्यांची तोंडे पश्चिमेंस होती व मी आंत शिरून फिरावयास जागा नव्हती म्हणून माझें तोंड पूर्वेस होतें. या प्रमाणें तोंडास तोंड लावून उराशी उर लावून आम्ही बसलों. पुढेंच जी स्त्री होती तिचें आंग सर्व घामानें भिजलेलें होतें. त्यावेळेस माझें वय सुमारें तीस वर्षांचें असावें व त्या स्त्रीचे वय अठरा वर्षांचे असावें. अशी तरुण स्त्रीपुरुषें एकमेकांशी घट्ट मिठी मारून बसली असतांही कामवासना बिलकुल उत्पन्न झाली नाही, हा भयंकर मृत्यूभीतीचा प्रभाव म्हण्टला पाहिजे. साहा सात घटका झाल्यावर जवळ आसपास कोठें आवाज होत नाहींत असें पाहून मीं त्या बंड्यांतून बाहेर पडलों..."

I have been going through old issues of (once) well-known Marathi magazine (now defunct) 'Vangmay Shobha' (वाङ्मय शोभा).

I was quite amused to come across the same para in another context.

While Vangmay-Shobha magazine was born in May 1939, 'Amrut' (अमृत), another (once) well-known and now defunct magazine, was launched in 1953.

Amrut seems to have met immediate success. Its editor Dr. A V Varti (डॉ. अ वा वर्टी) boasted that the success came despite his magazine not printing images of women on its cover.

This is how Dr. Varti stated  it:


This was a dig at Vangmay-Shobha because it used to print three-colored beautiful images of women, drawn by the likes of Dinanath Dalal (दीनानाथ दलाल), RaghuvirMulgaonkar (रघुवीर मुळगावकर) , even D G Godse (द ग गोडसे) (and later Shaym Joshi श्याम जोशी, Padma Sahasrabuddhe पद्मा सहस्रबुद्धे , Sarjerao Ghorpade सर्जेराव घोरपडे , Chitrakar Salkar चित्रकार सालकर etc.) on its cover.

Mr. Manohar Mahadev Kelkar (मनोहर महादेव केळकर), editor of Vangmay-Shobha , almost always sensible, rebutted this over two issues of his magazine in April and May 1954. Mr. Kelkar has tried to point out Amrut's hypocrisy over the issue. It was hypocrisy because Amrut had quoted the paragraph above (tight embrace of a woman not resulting into any amorous feelings)  from Godse's book as above and even printed a picture depicting the embrace.

Mr. Kelkar went on to say that wetness of woman's sweaty body and the fear on Godse's face were not apparent because of the poor quality of the drawing in Amrut!


Mr. Kelkar continued....




This is all so amusing!

To Mr. Kelkar's credit,  I find that his magazine never carried any titillating pictures on its cover.


cover of American magazine 'Look' dated January 30 1940 featuring actress Anne Gwynne

courtesy: Wikipedia

Saturday, November 26, 2022

The Greatest of All Comic Strips...Charles M. Schulz@100

#CharlesMSchulz100



Bryan Appleyard, The Spectator, January 2019:
"....Lucy is a cynic, a sadist, a huckster, a realist. Nevertheless, she would be right but for the fact that nothing is ever of ‘immeasurable value’ to Charlie Brown. He is too battered by life to be an idealist but he clings to hope, to the possibility that there is justice somewhere in the cosmos. He finds none but he is a good man, though only eight years old.

That, in a nutshell, is what Charles M. Schulz’s comic strip Peanuts is all about — the persistence of hope in the face of hopelessness. The strip ran in newspapers and on television from 1950 to 13 February 2000, the day after Schulz died.
It was — and remains — the greatest of all comic strips. Exquisitely drawn, beautifully written, timelessly true, it tenderly distils the absurdity and pain of the human condition. It is about children but it evades easy sentimentality by making the characters struggle with and suffer about childish things that are obviously adult things in disguise. You couldn’t pat Charlie Brown on the head and tell him not to worry, because he had already glimpsed the truth that, for good men like him, life is worry...."


Artist: Harry Bliss

Monday, November 21, 2022

It's Just a Mirage....FIFA WC Begins

Today November 21 2022, 2022 FIFA World Cup begins

Courtesy: The Spectator, UK, 2013

Saturday, November 19, 2022

जीएंचा डोळ्याच्या बाहुल्या उफराट्या असलेला एक प्राणी...Vermeer’s Precious Gem is an Opulent Optical Illusion

जी. ए. कुलकर्णी:   

"रेम्ब्राँन्टच्या चित्रांत छाया आणि प्रकाश यांना जे थोर वजन प्राप्त होते, ते कधी एकदा तरी आयुष्यात माझ्या शब्दांना लाभावे एवढीच माझी प्रार्थना आहे."

"... अद्यापही एखाद्या Rembrandt किंवा Vermeer सारख्या अद्वितीय चित्रकाराच्या कृतीची मी Tolerable copy करू शकतो..."

".. स्त्री काय, पुरुष काय, मानव म्हणजे एकंदरीने डोळ्याच्या बाहुल्या उफराट्या असलेला एक प्राणी हेच खरे !..."


 Kelly Grovier, 2019:  

"Think you see a pearl dangling lustrously in Vermeer’s famous portrait (c. 1665) of a girl endlessly turning towards or away from us? Think again. The swollen bauble around which the painting’s mystery spins is just a pigment of your imagination. With a flick of the wrist and two deft dabs of white paint, the artist has tricked the primary visual cortices of our brains’ occipital lobes into magicking a pearl from the thinnest of air. Squint as tight as you wish and there is no loop that links the ornament to her ear. Its very sphericity is a hoax. We’ve willed the earring into weightless suspension from the puniest of white apostrophes. Vermeer’s precious gem is an opulent optical illusion, one that reflects back on our own illusory presence in the world."

जीएंना हे optical illusion माहित होते का? माहित नाही पण त्यांनी "our own illusory presence in the world" या बद्दल मात्र वारंवार लिहले आहे.