मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… . . 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

What Made My Parents Cry? Sugar, Rice, Wheat, Cotton...

Inflation is high in India, particularly food inflation. The Consumer Price Index that is published today reads red hot  9.31%.   Current account deficit is knocking Indian rupee down,  stoking fears of even higher inflation.

(Inflation has appeared many times on this blog before. Most notably here and here.)

My father-in-law (borne 1930) belonged to an economically well off family. But he had to eat millet rotis when he went for college education in Solapur. He still describes how he had to swallow the rotis with hot peanut chutney powder (aka 'gun powder').

My parents after their marriage in 1957 were  struggling economically.

My father once told me how hard it was to find some affordable rice after the birth of my younger brother in June 1962 and the young mother wanted rice for herself and the two kids.

He, already a college teacher,  could get only some "yellow rice". (Was it because Chinese were at the gates and their shadow fell over the rice?)


Artist: Claude Smith, The New Yorker, 16 July 1960

So was food inflation higher then than today?

The Economist informs:

"In a new paper David Jacks, an economist at Simon Fraser University, assembles figures on inflation-adjusted prices for 30 commodities over 160 years...Over the very long run commodity prices display a marked upward trend, having risen by 192% since 1950, and by 252% since 1900. But an upward trend has clearly not translated into global famine, and not all commodities are alike.


Long-run rises have been most pronounced for commodities that are “in the ground”, like minerals and natural gas. Energy commodities especially have boomed, soaring by roughly 300% since 1950. Prices of precious metals have also risen, as have industrial ingredients like iron ore. In contrast, prices for resources that can be grown have trended downwards (see chart). The inflation-adjusted prices of rice, corn and wheat are lower now than they were in 1950. Although the global population is 2.8 times above its 1950 level, world grain production is 3.6 times higher."


Look at the chart below. Rice, wheat, sugar, cotton- all essential commodities for a middle-class family- are today more than 50%  cheaper than they were in 1950's.

I remember how precious sugar was when I was a kid. Most non-Brahmin families (and even a few Brahmin ones too)  in our neighbourhood could not afford it and drank tea with milk and jaggery. They could afford  rice and wheat only on festival or other special days. Most had very few clothes.

So my parents, in-laws and their contemporaries  have borne the brunt of food inflation far more than me.




courtesy: The Economist, June 2013

2 comments:

mannab said...

Your latest post is timely written and expresses 'our' views in total. I wish to translate with your kind permission and publish in 'Maitri' blog soon.Pl reply.
Mangesh Nabar

Aniruddha G. Kulkarni said...

Thanks Mangesh.

Please go head and do what you wish to.

I will be happy to see it in Marathi.

best,