Writing
Vijay Tendulkar’s विजय तेंडुलकर obit,
Girish Karnad says:
“…Then came Sakharam Binder. It's not only Tendulkar's best play, but one of the masterpieces of
Indian drama. When first performed, several political parties united to demand a ban on the play, and it had to be rescued by the courts. Its critics claimed to be scandalised by its overt sexuality. But one suspects that Tendulkar had once again hit a raw nerve, the basic middle-class hunger for property as a guarantee of security, and the ruthlessness this hunger could unleash.
Lakshmi, a perfect embodiment of
Hindu womanly virtues, manoeuvres a murder to keep the roof intact over her head, invulnerable in her sense of moral rectitude…” (
Outlook June 2, 2008)
This angle I had never thought.
As real estate prices climb relentlessly in
Pune, everyday one hears sordid stories of greed, corruption, moral decay and crumbling family values.
Duryodhana’s following words don’t sound all that far-fetched: “The
Pandavas will not receive even a needle- point of territory,"
In
1980’s, I lived in a
Bombay where girls fell in love only after ascertaining where the suitor’s property was located.
Western suburbs upto
Andheri were preferred over eastern ones. I had no chance because I had neither! Now I joke about it, then I felt castrated.
Now, the whole of urban India is Bombay.
I mentioned ancient India by quoting from the
Mahabharata. Let us turn to an example from
American history.
WILLIAM HOGELAND said in
NYT December 27, 2006:
“…In 1763,
George III drew a line on a map stretching from modern-day
Maine to modern-day
Georgia, along the crest of the
Appalachians. He declared it illegal to claim or settle land west of the line, all of which he reserved for
Native Americans.
George Washington, a young colonel in the
Virginia militia, instructed his land-buying agents in the many ways of getting around the law. Although Washington was not alone in acquiring forbidden tracts, few were as energetic in the illegal acquisition of western land…
… By the early 1770’s, George Washington had amassed vast tracts to which his titles were flatly invalid.
The Revolution rectified that. With
British law void, Washington emerged from the war with his titles legal by default…”
Jonathan Yardley said in
Washington Post May 18, 2008:
“…Not merely did George Washington want the capital on the
Potomac, he also "was determined to place the capital close to the
Eastern Branch, today known as the
Anacostia River, virtually across the Potomac from his own estate at
Mount Vernon." Washington believed that the Potomac was fated to be the essential connection between the
Atlantic and the rapidly growing West -- he didn't know, or more likely didn't want to know, that for most of the year much of the Potomac is unnavigable -- and "he stood to make a great deal of money" from a capital on the Potomac, a useful reminder that the motives of the
Father of His Country were not always pristinely patriotic…”
Artist:
Bruce Erik Kaplan The New Yorker 17 January 1994
or should it read "I've killed Good Lord."?
