मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि च दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… इ. स. 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Saturday, July 16, 2022

Nicolaes Maes and Rembrandt

Ferdinand Mount wrote in March 2020 for TLS:
"... At times, Rembrandt and Maes do work exactly the same reflective magic. Compare, for example Rembrandt’s “Girl at a Window” in Dulwich with Maes’s picture of the same title here, both so quiet and so infinitely arresting.

Yet, for the most part, what Maes does not so much lack the capacity for as actively abjure is the theatricality that makes Rembrandt’s great biblical masterpieces: those poignant figures carrying out their destiny in a pool of light, dwarfed by the surrounding darkness – seen in abundance at the recent exhibition, Rembrandt’s Light, at the Dulwich Picture Gallery. If there is drama in Maes, it is what we now call “immersive theatre”. We are part of the action; there’s no proscenium arch; if there is a stage, it’s an apron stage. We are walking the same street, enjoying the same fresh air of Amsterdam or Dordrecht, dawdling at the same back door with the girl selling milk.

Compare Maes’s portraits of the armaments king Jacob Trip and his equally formidable wife, Margaretha de Geer, with Rembrandt’s portraits of the same couple on show upstairs with the National Gallery’s other Dutch pictures. The Rembrandts are marvellous representations of a fierce and undimmed old age. But they are distanced from the spectator – that is part of their emotional power – while in the Maes version, Jacob and Margaretha seem to be in the room with us, unsettling presences..."


“Girl at a Window”, and at bottom, portraits of Margaretha de Geer, wife of Jacob Trip





Posted by at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)