मेघदूत: "नीचैर्गच्छत्युपरि दशा चक्रनेमिक्रमेण"

समर्थ शिष्या अक्का : "स्वामीच्या कृपाप्रसादे हे सर्व नश्वर आहे असे समजले. पण या नश्वरात तमाशा बहुत आहे."

G C Lichtenberg: “It is as if our languages were confounded: when we want a thought, they bring us a word; when we ask for a word, they give us a dash; and when we expect a dash, there comes a piece of bawdy.”

C. P. Cavafy: "I’d rather look at things than speak about them."

Martin Amis: “Gogol is funny, Tolstoy in his merciless clarity is funny, and Dostoyevsky, funnily enough, is very funny indeed; moreover, the final generation of Russian literature, before it was destroyed by Lenin and Stalin, remained emphatically comic — Bunin, Bely, Bulgakov, Zamyatin. The novel is comic because life is comic (until the inevitable tragedy of the fifth act);...”

सदानंद रेगे: "... पण तुकारामाची गाथा ज्या धुंदीनं आजपर्यंत वाचली जात होती ती धुंदी माझ्याकडे नाहीय. ती मला येऊच शकत नाही याचं कारण स्वभावतःच मी नास्तिक आहे."

".. त्यामुळं आपण त्या दारिद्र्याच्या अनुभवापलीकडे जाऊच शकत नाही. तुम्ही जर अलीकडची सगळी पुस्तके पाहिलीत...तर त्यांच्यामध्ये त्याच्याखेरीज दुसरं काही नाहीच आहे. म्हणजे माणसांच्या नात्यानात्यांतील जी सूक्ष्मता आहे ती क्वचित चितारलेली तुम्हाला दिसेल. कारण हा जो अनुभव आहे... आपले जे अनुभव आहेत ते ढोबळ प्रकारचे आहेत....."

Kenneth Goldsmith: "In 1969 the conceptual artist Douglas Huebler wrote, “The world is full of objects, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.”1 I’ve come to embrace Huebler’s ideas, though it might be retooled as “The world is full of texts, more or less interesting; I do not wish to add any more.” It seems an appropriate response to a new condition in writing today: faced with an unprecedented amount of available text, the problem is not needing to write more of it; instead, we must learn to negotiate the vast quantity that exists. How I make my way through this thicket of information—how I manage it, how I parse it, how I organize and distribute it—is what distinguishes my writing from yours."

Tom Wolfe: "The first line of the doctors’ Hippocratic oath is ‘First, do no harm.’ And I think for the writers it would be: ‘First, entertain.’"

विलास सारंग: "… . . 1000 नंतर ज्या प्रकारची संस्कृती रुढ झाली , त्यामध्ये साधारणत्व विश्वात्मकता हे गुण प्राय: लुप्त झाले...आपली संस्कृती अकाली विश्वात्मक साधारणतेला मुकली आहे."

Friday, December 11, 2020

जी ए कुलकर्णीं स्मृतिदिन....The Best Doctor by Alfred Kubin

#जीएकुलकर्णींस्मृतिदिन 

आज डिसेंबर ११ २०२०, जी ए कुलकर्णींचा ३३वा स्मृतिदिन

जी ए कुलकर्णी, 'घऱ', पृष्ठ २१८, 'पिंगळावेळ', १९७७:
"...  तिला एकदा तिचे घर मिळाले की मी सुटलो. मग मोडीत निघालेल्या माझ्या ठोकायंत्राची मला भीती नाही. केंव्हा का बंद पडेना ते ! मग शेजारी सिगरेटचे एक पूर्ण पाकीट असावे. एखादा दरबारी छबिना  चौघडे-तुताऱ्या वाजवत डौलाने यावा, त्याप्रमाणे वाटणारा मालकंस टेंपरेकोर्डवर तासभर उलगडत असावा. या दरिद्री जनतायुगात निःसंकोच सरदारी दिमागाने चित्रे आणि लेख छापणारे 'National Geographic' किंवा 'Realities'- सारखे एखादे मासिक हातात असावे . मग बोलावणे येऊन घेणाऱ्या , तू कसाही ये. तू दार ठोठावून ये. अगर आडदांडासारखा आत शीर.  असल्या एका सिगरेट मधून आलास तरी चालेल- नव्हे तू तसाच ये ! ते मलादेखील फार आवडेल ! ..."


Alfred Kubin, The Best Doctor, c. 1901

Hilary Ilkay, Lapham's Quarterly, December 2013
"....symbolist painter and writer Alfred Kubin strips death of any disguise in his pen-and-ink drawing, The Best Doctor. Composed between 1901 and 1902, Kubin’s creation is eerily hermaphroditic: the bare skull sprouts tufts of straggly long hair and the body is an amalgamation of masculine muscular arms and a flat chest with sharply exaggerated feminine curves, outlined by a tight black dress. It could almost be described as a figure in drag. The drawing is a dark reflection on humans’ trust in the saving powers of medicine. Death, supposedly “the best doctor,” is not gently covering the eyes of the deceased man, but forcibly pressing down on his face and smothering him." 
 
Réalités (French magazine) 1946-1981 हे मासिक जीए जायच्या आधीच गेल होत. त्याच्या दोन अंकांची मुखपृष्ठे  सोबत. दोन्हीच्या थिम्स ह्या कलावंत आणि निर्मिती ह्या आहेत असे वाटते. 
 
 
Jean-Philippe Charbonnier, Réalités, April  1958


 Jean-Philippe Charbonnier, Réalités, Jan  1958

Wednesday, December 09, 2020

When Death Plays Beth Harmon...

 "And when the Lamb had opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven about the space of half an hour"

The Seventh Seal, 1957

One of the pivotal scene from Ingmar Bergman's great film 'The Seventh Seal' was inspired by
a medieval church painting:

 'Death playing chess' by Albertus Pictor (1440-1507). 

Location: Täby kyrka, Diocese of Stockholm.

 courtesy: Wikipedia
 
 Death (Bengt Ekerot in The Seventh Seal, 1957) plays Beth Harmon (Anya Taylor-Joy in The Queen's Gambit , 2020)

Sunday, December 06, 2020

लुक्रीशसची .स्वच्छ, जळजळीत दृष्टी...Lucretius' Importance and G A Kulkarni

 

जी ए कुलकर्णी,  लुक्रीशस च्या 'ऑन दी नेचर ऑफ थिंग्ज' ह्या  पुस्तका बद्दल म्हणतात:

 "...स्वच्छ, जळजळीत दृष्टीने Lucretius ने केलेला देव, देवता, भाबड्या कल्पना यांचा विध्वंस मला आवडला होता...". 

(पृष्ठ २४८, 'जी. एं.ची निवडक पत्रे', खंड २, १९८८)  

ही पोस्ट वाचण्यापूर्वी ह्याच ब्लॉग वरची मार्च २६ २०१८ तारखेची पोस्ट वाचा. 

लुक्रीशस बद्दल मराठीत चर्चा मी तरी पहिली नाही. विंदा करंदीकर त्यांच्या 'अष्टदर्शने', २००३ मध्ये त्याचा उल्लेख करत नाहीत. 

पण तो किती महत्वाचा आहे हे मला हा पॉडकास्ट  (conversation between John N. Gray and Richard Holloway in November 2020) ऐकून पुन्हा एकदा समजले. 

लुक्रीशस  (१५ ऑक्टोबर इ. स पू ९९- इ. स पू ५५) च्या  'ऑन दी नेचर ऑफ थिंग्ज' चा अनुवाद जी. एं.ना करायचा होता. 

लुक्रीशसच्या 'ऑन दी नेचर ऑफ थिंग्ज' पुस्तकामुळे जग आधुनिक झाले असा दावा करणारे आणि पुलित्झर (२०१२) आणि अमेरिकेचा नॅशनल बुक अवॉर्ड (२०११) मिळवणारे पुस्तक पाहून जीएंना अत्यानंद झाला असता. 

Stephen Greenblatt, 'The Swerve: How The World Became Modern", 2011:

"...The stuff of the universe, Lucretius proposed, is an infinite number of atoms moving randomly through space, like dust motes in a sunbeam, colliding, hooking together, forming complex structures, breaking apart again, in a ceaseless process of creation and destruction. There is no escape from this process. When you look up at the night sky and, feeling unaccountably moved, marvel at the numberless stars, you are not seeing the handiwork of the gods or a crystalline sphere detached from our transient world. You are seeing the same material world of which you are a part and from whose elements you are made. There is no master plan, no divine architect, no intelligent design. All things, including the species to which you belong, have evolved over vast stretches of time. The evolution is random, though in the case of living organisms it involves a principle of natural selection. That is, species that are suited to survive and to reproduce successfully endure, at least for a time; those that are not so well suited die off quickly. But nothing—from our own species to the planet on which we live to the sun that lights our days—lasts forever. Only the atoms are immortal.

In a universe so constituted, Lucretius argued, there is no reason to think that the earth or its inhabitants occupy a central place, no reason to set humans apart from all other animals, no hope of bribing or appeasing the gods, no place for religious fanaticism, no call for ascetic self-denial, no justification for dreams of limitless power or perfect security, no rationale for wars of conquest or self-aggrandizement, no possibility of triumphing over nature, no escape from the constant making and unmaking and remaking of forms. On the other side of anger at those who either peddled false visions of security or incited irrational fears of death, Lucretius offered a feeling of liberation and the power to stare down what had once seemed so menacing. What human beings can and should do, he wrote, is to conquer their fears, accept the fact that they themselves and all the things they encounter are transitory, and embrace the beauty and the pleasure of the world.

I marveled—I continue to marvel—that these perceptions were fully articulated in a work written more than two thousand years ago. The line between this work and modernity is not direct: nothing is ever so simple. There were innumerable forgettings, disappearances, recoveries, dismissals, distortions, challenges, transformations, and renewed forgettings. And yet the vital connection is there. Hidden behind the worldview I recognize as my own is an ancient poem, a poem once lost, apparently irrevocably, and then found..."
 
 

Thursday, December 03, 2020

गर्ट , श्री के क्षीरसागर आणि रस्त्यावर उघडणारी खिडकी....The Large Window of Our Miraj House

Sabine Rewald, curator of “Rooms with a View: The Open Window in the 19th Century”, 2011: 

“…Most artists painted so few open window scenes that I had to go all over to find the ones that existed….” 

The picture enclosed is : 'Goethe at the Window of His Roman Apartment'.... 

John Armstrong, city-journal, Autumn 2013:
"... Consider, for example, Tischbein’s Goethe at the Window of His Roman Apartment. We see the great man from behind: a slipper falls casually from his foot as he leans out, and the dim coolness of the room and the bright sunshine of the street make a powerful contrast. Some might see in this work an attempt to preserve the lessons learned on holiday. Away from home and work, in the warm South, Goethe became (like most travelers) a slightly different—and, in some ways, better—version of himself. The drawing attempts to memorialize the good version of the self and make that more prominent and more readily accessible when one has returned to familiar surroundings. The point is not so much to recall that Rome was interesting as to encapsulate who one became there. Goethe could hardly take the Italian weather back to Weimar; what he could do was hold on to the insight into his nature and needs that he gained while away. Hence it is a pity if one is more likely to encounter such images on the walls of a pensione in Trastevere than in a subway station in a metropolis, where its meditative qualities are more needed.. ."

माझे वडील त्यांच्या एस पी कॉलेज, पुणे तील कॉलेज जीवनामधील १९५० च्या दशकातील एखादी आठवण अधून मधून सांगायचे. त्यांचे एक प्राध्यापक होते मराठी साहित्यिक आणि टीकाकार श्री के क्षीरसागर. 
 
वडील म्हणत श्रीकेक्षींना मराठीतील 'खिडकी' हा शब्द अगदी गद्य आणि रोमँटिक गोष्टींसाठी अगदी अयोग्य वाटत असे. 

मला त्याचे कारण कधीच समजले नाही... श्रीकेक्षींनी 'पडोसन', १९६८ हा सिनेमा कधी बघितला का मला माहित नाही... कारण ज्याला त्यातील 'मेरे सामने वाली खिड़की में' ह्या सुमधुर गाण्यातील किंवा एकूणच त्या अप्रतिम सिनेमातील खिडकीचे महत्व समजले असेल तो खिडकी या शब्दाला  श्रीकेक्षीं सारखा दोष आयुष्यात देणार नाही. 
 
चित्र पाहताना, मला आमची मिरजेची, माडीवरची रस्त्याच्या लगतची- एका माणसाला सहज बसता येईल अशी- मोठी खिडकी आठवली... ती खिडकी म्हणजे आमची घरातील सर्वात जास्त exciting वाटणारी गोष्ट होती (१९६१- १९८४)... 
 
तिची तुलना हिचकॉक यांच्या Rear Window, 1954 शी करता येईल... लग्नाच्या वरातींपासून प्रेतयात्रे पर्यंत.... सुंदर मुली पहाणे, हवाहवासा पाऊस , शेजाऱ्यांच्या घरात डोकावणे, कुटुंबातील व्यक्तींची वाट पहाणे सगळे सगळे तिथे बसून झाले आहे ...


'Goethe am Fenster seiner römischen Wohnung', 1787
 
Artist : Johann Heinrich Wilhelm Tischbein

याच प्रकारचे आणखी एक चित्र बघायला मिळाले :

 The Attic Room,  1946  by Louis Icart 1880- 1950