आजपासून तीन दिवसानंतर, जानेवारी
२१ २०१८ रोजी अलेक्झांडर
हर्झन यांची १४८वी
पुण्यतिथी आहे.
John N. Gray:
"...He remains an intensely relevant thinker – one of
very few who have grasped the true import of evolutionary theory, which is to
subvert any belief in teleology in the natural world or (since human beings
belong in that world) in history. Neither the cosmos nor the human species is
going anywhere in particular. This may seem a dispiriting view, but for a few –
including Isaiah Berlin, who more than anyone else kept Herzen’s thought alive
in the 20th century – it has been liberating. If history has no script, human
beings are free to improvise and explore many different paths of development.
But this is not how the idea of evolution has been
understood or used. In the 19th and 20th centuries, it was appropriated to prop
up grand political projects – whether laissez-faire capitalism or Soviet-style
communism – of the kind Herzen despised. Today it is used by popular writers
such as Richard Dawkins to bolster the faith that ‘humanity’ – ‘a sort of
piebald demi-god’, in Herzen’s words – can transcend the workings of chance and
shape its own future. The lesson Herzen spent much of his life teaching has not
been learned..."
अशोक शहाणे, नपेक्षा, २००५:
"... कीकेंगार्डच्याच काळात लोकहितवादीनी लिखाण
केले आहे, कीकेंगार्डपासून
युरोपमध्ये विचारांच्या क्षेत्रात एक
नवीनच वृत्ती आली.
कीकेंगार्डने तर्कबुद्धीला प्रचंड धक्का देणारे
लिखाण हेतुपुरःसरच केले
आणि आमच्या लोकहितवादीनी
मात्र सबंध विचाराचा
पाया केवळ बुद्धीनेच
घातला जावा अशी
धडपड केली. कीकेंगार्डच्याच
काळात लोकहितवादीनी लिहिले
ही निदान आता
तरी क्रूर थट्टाच
वाटते." (पृष्ठ: १५, १६)
असच काहीस नीत्शे आणि आगरकरांबद्दल शहाणे म्हणतात.
शहाणे असही म्हणतात:
"....टिळक-आगरकर ह्या जोडीत टिळकांची दुर्दशा आगरकरांपेक्षा शतपटींनी जास्त आहे. हा गृहस्थ अत्यंत व्यवहारी - एखाद्या किराणाभुसाराच्या दुकानदारासारखा. शिवाय हे गीतेवर भाष्य लिहू धजले आणि मिल
आणि स्पेन्सर ह्यांचा
त्यांनी विचारसादृश्य असणारे म्हणून तळटिपांतून
उल्लेख केला. ही त्या
काळच्या बुद्धीच्या दारिद्र्याची ठळक
निशाणी म्हणून सांगता येईल.मिल आणि स्पेन्सर
ह्यांची पुस्तके 'क्रमिक' स्वरुपाची
आहेत, ही गोष्ट
ध्यानात घेतली म्हणजे त्या
काळच्या महाराष्ट्रातल्या वैचारिक नेतृत्वाची कल्पना
येईल..."
ह्यातले सगळेच सगळ्यांना पटेल असे नाही. उदा: माझी बाजू मी इथे मांडली होती.
Commenting on the list of current thinkers / intellectuals
published by Foreign Policy magazine in 2011 and comparing it to an imaginary
list prepared in 1861, Gideon Rachman says:
"...It is an impressive group of people (from 2011).
But now compare it with a similar list that could have been compiled 150 years
ago. The 1861 rankings could have started with Charles Darwin and John Stuart
Mill – On the Origin of Species and On Liberty were both published in 1859.
Then you could include Karl Marx and Charles Dickens. And that was just the
people living in and around London. In Russia, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky were both
at work, although neither had yet published their greatest novels. Even if,
like Foreign Policy, you have a preference for politicians, the contrast
between the giants of yesteryear and the relative pygmies of today is
alarming..."
(Financial Times, January 24 2011)
एफ.टी च्या यादीत मिल आहेत, नीत्शे नाहीत, कीकेंगार्ड नाहीत.
पण एक नाव इथ कुठच न आल्याचा खेद वाटतो: अलेक्झांडर हर्झन १८१२-१८७० (Alexander Herzen).
त्याचे एक महत्वाचे कारण असे असावे की त्यांच्या उतार वयात हर्झनयांची लोकप्रियता खूप कमी, जवळजवळ नष्ट, झाली होती. त्यांचे लेखन सुद्धा भारतात उपलब्ध होते की नाही कुणास ठाऊक. पण मला वाटते की वरील दोन्ही अडचणी जरी नसत्या तरी ते भारतातील तत्कालीन विचारवंतांत लोकप्रिय झाले नसते कारण अजून सुद्धा मराठी लेखनात त्यांचा उल्लेख मी वाचलेला नाही.
टॉम स्टॊपार्ड (Tom Stoppard) यांच्या नाटकातील कार्ल मार्क्स आणि हर्झन यांच्यातील काल्पनिक संवाद वाचा:
त्याचे एक महत्वाचे कारण असे असावे की त्यांच्या उतार वयात हर्झनयांची लोकप्रियता खूप कमी, जवळजवळ नष्ट, झाली होती. त्यांचे लेखन सुद्धा भारतात उपलब्ध होते की नाही कुणास ठाऊक. पण मला वाटते की वरील दोन्ही अडचणी जरी नसत्या तरी ते भारतातील तत्कालीन विचारवंतांत लोकप्रिय झाले नसते कारण अजून सुद्धा मराठी लेखनात त्यांचा उल्लेख मी वाचलेला नाही.
टॉम स्टॊपार्ड (Tom Stoppard) यांच्या नाटकातील कार्ल मार्क्स आणि हर्झन यांच्यातील काल्पनिक संवाद वाचा:
"... MARX: The Sandwich
Islands? Like Russia, and for the same reason, the Sandwich Islands are
irrelevant. Considered as a social class acting out its destiny in a struggle
with the class above, the proletariat of the Sandwich Islands is not as yet
significant. I couldn’t recommend it, you’d miss all the fun. None of us may
live long enough, but when it comes, the cataclysm will be glorious … Every
stage leads to a higher stage in the permanent conflict which is the march of
history. Industrialisation, ever expanding to feed the markets for canoes,
cooking pots, samovars … and ever contracting to drive out competition …
alienates the worker more and more from the product of his toil, until Capital
and Labour stand revealed in fatal contradiction. Then will come the final
titanic struggle, the last turn of the great wheel of progress beneath which
generations of toiling masses perished for the ultimate victory. Now at last
the unity and rationality of history’s purpose will be clear to
everyone—even—finally—to the last Islander and to the last muzhik. Everything
that seemed vicious, mean and ugly, the broken lives and ignoble deaths of
millions, will be understood as part of a higher reality, a superior morality,
against which resistance is irrational—a cosmos where every atom has been
striving for the goal of human self-realisation and the culmination of history.
I see the Neva lit by flames and running red, the coconut palms hung with
corpses all along the shining strand from Kronstadt to the Nevsky Prospekt
HERZEN (to Marx)
But history has no culmination! There is always as much in front as
behind. There is no libretto. History knocks at a thousand gates at every moment,
and the gatekeeper is chance. We shout into the mist for this one or that one
to be opened for us, but through every gate there are a thousand more. We need
wit and courage to make our way while our way is making us. But that is our
dignity as human beings, and we rob ourselves if we pardon us by the absolution
of historical necessity. What kind of beast is it, this Ginger Cat with its
insatiable appetite for human sacrifice? This Moloch who promises that
everything will be beautiful after we’re dead? A distant end is not an end but
a trap. The end we work for must be closer, the labourer’s wage, the pleasure
in the work done, the summer lightning of personal happiness …"
आधुनिक मराठी विचारात हर्झनयांचा विचार दुसऱ्याचा म्हणून सुद्धा प्रकट केला जात नाही. History has no culmination अशा विचारांना सध्याच्या महाराष्ट्रात थारा नाही. इथे फक्त मानवी प्रगतीचे गीत गायले जाते,
Painting by A. A. Zbruev
No comments:
Post a Comment