Today June 9 2017 is 111th birth anniversary of Baburao Arnalkar (बाबूराव अर्नाळकर) 1906-1996
Ezra Pund:
"Make it new."
Graham Moore, The New York Times, January 2017:
"...Not even
Conan Doyle could have imagined just how long his creation would outlive him.
Since Conan Doyle’s own death, Holmes has been depicted in dozens of feature
films, television series, stage plays, comics, radio dramas and video games.
The pastiche novels — that is, Holmes stories not composed by his creator — are
even more numerous. Holmes is arguably the most famous fictional character of
the past two centuries, rivaled only by Dracula and James Bond, with perhaps,
as the decades wear on, Batman and Harry Potter nipping at their heels..."
Georges Simenon, ‘The Train’, 1961:
“...I have always been a prudish man, even in my thoughts.
I wasn’t discontented with my way of life. I had chosen it.
I had patiently realized an ideal which, until the previous day—I repeat this
in all sincerity—had satisfied me completely.
Now I was there, in the dark, with the song of the train,
red and green lights passing by, telegraph wires, other bodies stretched out in
the straw, and close beside me, within reach of my hand, what the Abbé Dubois
called the carnal act was taking place.
Against my own body, a woman’s body pressed itself, tense,
vibrant, and a hand moved to pull up the black dress, to push the panties down
to the feet which kicked them off with an odd jerking movement.
We still hadn’t kissed each other. It was Anna who drew me
toward her, on top of her, both of us as silent as snakes.
Julie’s breathing grew quicker and louder just as Anna was
helping me to enter her, and I suddenly found myself there.
I didn’t cry out. But I came close to doing so. I came close
to talking incoherently, saying thank you, telling of my happiness, or else
complaining, for that happiness hurt me. Hurt me with the attempt to reach the
unattainable.
I should have liked to express all at once my affection for
this woman whom I hadn’t known the day before, but who was a human being, who
in my eyes was becoming the human being...”
विलास सारंग, 'शेक्सपियरचं भाषांतर', 'लिह्त्या लेखकाचं वाचन', २०११:
"... O God! a beast that wants...याचं भाषांतर श्री. नाईक करतात : अरे देवा,
'अरे देवा' हे शब्द वाचून मला लहानपणी अर्नाळकरांनी शब्दशः भाषांतरित केलेल्या डिटेक्टिव्ह कादंबऱ्यांची आठवण झाली! नायकाने 'अरे देवा!' अस म्हटल्यावर आम्ही हसायचो!..."
ब. ल. वष्ट, वाङ्मय शोभा, सप्टेंबर १९५०:
In January 2017, I read two articles.
Mr. Elkunchwar laments the near death of the genre 'crime fiction' in Marathi and the likely reasons thereof.
"...आता
तर या लेखनप्रकाराचा
मागमूसही दिसत नाही.
वाचायचे ते उद्बोधनासाठी,
माहितीसाठी, सामाजिक जाणिवा तेवत
ठेवण्यासाठी, इ. सर्व
उद्दिष्टे डोळ्यांसमोर ठेवून वाचन
करणाऱ्या मराठी वाचकाला रंजनासाठी
रहस्यकथा वाचणे हे अभिरुची
सोडल्याचे लक्षण वाटत होते
का?..."
"(वाटत होते.) पण हाच
वाचक तद्दन रंजनप्रधान
नाटके पाहतो, ‘विविध
भारती’वरची प्राणहीन
मराठी गाणी ऐकतो,
कोळीनृत्य व लावणी
ही त्याची सांस्कृतिक
घटनांची व्याख्या असते. त्याने
रहस्यकथेकडे पाठ फिरवण्याचा
अर्थ मला कळत
नाही..."
I first read
Sherlock Holmes, in Marathi, in early 1970's. Most of them I had borrowed it from a small book lending library. During the same period, out of curiosity, I also read Arnalkar's novels. Although I did finish reading a few of Arnalkar's novels, I never fell in love with them unlike the books- most in Marathi- of Doyle,
Erle Stanley Gardner, James Hadley Chase, Alistair MacLean, Narayan Dharap (नारायण धारप), Gurunath Naik (गुरुनाथ नाईक),
Shrikant Sinkar (श्रीकांत सिनकर),
Indrajal Comics featuring
Phantom, Mandrake and
Flash Gordon.
Therefore, I was surprised to read Mr. Elkunchwar's following claim in the aforementioned article.
"...मुले मराठी वाचत नसतील,
त्यांना वाचनाची गोडी नसेल;
तर सर्व आई-बापांनी त्यांना अर्नाळकरांच्या
पुस्तकांची चटक अवश्य
लावावी. पाहा, किती चांगला
परिणाम होतो ते...."
As the late Mr. Sarang opines above, I often felt as an adolescent that Mr. Arnalkar was translating from English word for word. My son, 23, once an avid reader of books, was/is unlikely to even touch his books. Moreover the kids these days get to read Sherlock of Doyle as well as Sherlock that has been made new. On top of that we have to reckon with the decline of conventional books (अक्षर वाङ्मय) in the pecking order. For an urban middle-class young person today, video games, mobile telephony and TV serials come much higher. Elkunchwar himself admits: "...
आज पुन्हा अर्नाळकर मी वाचतो तेव्हा कंटाळा येतो;..."
Sure, as Elkunchwar describes, Arnalkar's novels probably had some good qualities such as the simplicity and the smooth flow of the language, seamless creation of new words, naming of the characters, description of Mumbai but his books never had any quality like. for instance, that of, say, Georges Simenon.
John Gray writes about Simenon:
"...
Some of the best examples of what is commonly described as
crime fiction – the novels of Patricia Highsmith, for instance – are
studies in character which show why the protagonists act as they do by probing
their states of mind. In Simenon, human beings are the sum of their impulses and
behaviours; there is no enduring self behind the façade of habit. No one
authors their own life; the belief that they are responsible for their actions
is an illusion...
...André Gide was not exaggerating when he described Simenon as
one of the greatest 20th-century writers of fiction. (Other admirers include T
S Eliot, Henry Miller, William Faulkner and John Banville.) By the time he died
in 1989, he was one of the most widely published writers in history, with world
sales of over 500 million books and many film adaptations to his credit..."
Arnalkar did not seem to even try what
Bhau Padhye (भाऊ पाध्ये) later achieved in his
Mumbai based novels: Capturing alienation, desperation, all conquering commerce, impossibility of finding an affordable dwelling, ubiquitous
Hindi cinema...something
Saadat Hasan Manto (1921-1955) had also achieved in a few of his Mumbai based stories.
We also have to take into consideration the imported inspiration that was available to Mr. Arnalkar: Noir films and glorious tradition of pulp magazines. (I have always felt that the golden age of Hindi cinema 1949-1965 freely borrowed from noir films and Jazz music.)
“...Dashiell Hammett found a home for a lot of his fiction in Black
Mask, one of America’s great bygone pulp magazines. Raymond Chandler, Carroll
John Daly, and other masters of detective fiction all placed their work in
Black Mask, which first published Hammett in 1922, and which serialized The
Maltese Falcon in 1929... in 1930, when Black Mask had a circulation of
130,000...”
Joseph Cotten and Jean Peters in Andew L. Stone's 'A Blueprint for Murder', 1953
courtesy: 20th Century Fox
Even crime fiction written in Marathi is of the same average (to mediocre) quality as most of the fictional writing done in it in 20th century. Mr. Arnalkar, who was a better writer than most of the contemporary Marathi novelists, entertained millions of Marathi readers and we all should be grateful to him for that.
आपण बाबुराव अर्नाळकर यांच्यावर जे लिहिलं आहे त्यावरून आजच्या परिस्थितीची थोडी कल्पना आली. आज रहस्यकथा कुणी वाचत नाही हे आमच्या सत्तरीतल्या पिढीतल्या लोकांना खरे वाटणार नाही. मी आमच्या वेळी रहस्यकथा जरी थोड्या वाचल्या तरी त्या रुचीने वाचणारामाझा एक मित्र होता त्याची आज आठवण आली. तो चक्क रोज एक रहस्यकथा आमच्या नाक्यावरील अशी पुस्तके वाचनालयासारखी वाचायला देणा-या माणसाकडून घेऊन जात असे. या नादामुळे त्याचे अभ्यासात काही कमी होत होते असे कधी झाले नाही. तो व्यवस्थित शिकला पदवीधर झाला आणि बँकेत लागला. त्याचे रोज एक पुस्तक वाचण्याचे वेड कित्येक वर्षे अव्याहत चालू होते.
ReplyDeleteआज लोक रहस्यकथा का वाचत नाहीत ? मला याचा शोध घ्यायला हवा. आपण मला हा रिकामपणीच एक उद्योग दिला असे नाही. पण एक कुतूहल म्हणून मी हे करीन आणि आपल्याला माझे निरीक्षण काय ते कळवीन.
मंगेश नाबर
interesting thought...thanks
ReplyDelete