Samuel Brittan:
"The Greek philosopher
Diogenes is said to have lived in a tub. But far from being dismissed as a
crank, he was the only thinker whom Alexander the Great went to see – the
others had to come to him. Was Diogenes a happy man? You can answer how you
like. You can say that he was happy living in a tub. Or you can say that he
thought that other things were more important than happiness."
Graham Hill has written an interesting essay for The New York Times, March 9 2013 titled 'Living With Less. A Lot Less'. Read it
here.
Such things keep appearing in the Western media from time to time. The most recent famous example of it, as I remember, would be J
ared Diamond's essay “
What’s Your Consumption Factor?” (The NYT, January 2 2008). Read that essay
here.
I often wonder if this is a long, loud belch after a sumptuous meal or is there more to it?
My first question to the likes of Mr. Hill would be: why do you have to say this? Why not just more people do it?
My second question: why do you have to be successful first and then throw away things? Why not be a 'failure' in the world's eyes to begin with? Won't it make things much simpler? Less garbage to clear for municipal authorities.
My final question to him: Are you happy saying : 'My space is small. My life is big.'? What if your space is small and life too is small?
All my life I have been always attracted to austere living rooms. I have lost count of how many such rooms I have seen during my childhood at
Miraj. My classmates who came to Miraj from nearby villages to study after 7th or 10th always lived in such rooms and ate even simpler meals.
To my eyes, even following elegant and world-famous room looks crowded!
Artist:
Vincent van Gogh, 'Bedroom in Arles', 1888
Instead I like this room:
Artist: Alok Shukla, "Blue Nile", April
2010
courtesy: Jamuna Inamdar
SIMON
CRITCHLEY says:
“...Diogenes credited his
teacher Antisthenes with introducing him to a life of poverty and happiness —
of poverty as happiness. The cynic’s every word and action was dedicated to the
belief that the path to individual freedom required absolute honesty and
complete material austerity.
So Diogenes threw away his
cup when he saw people drinking from their hands. He lived in a barrel, rolling
in it over hot sand in the summer. He inured himself to cold by embracing
statues blanketed with snow. He ate raw squid to avoid the trouble of cooking.
He mocked the auctioneer while being sold into slavery..."
p.s There is another problem with collecting stuff....excess baggage charges on the final journey!
Artist: Richard Jolley (RGJ), The Spectator, UK , 2013
Artist: Alok Shukla, "Blue Nile" April 2010.
ReplyDeleteI love all your questions.
Dear Aniruddha,
ReplyDeleteThank you for crediting me as an artist. That was very generous of you.
As for the rest of your post, I would say that austerity, like any other wisdom can't be forced upon.. not even when you are aware of and appreciate the advantages it has to offer.
In most cases it needs to follow possession not only because the world encourages it and most of us are not naturally aware of the choice since we are conditioned to hoard things, but more importantly also because we need to know both sides of the coin. At least I do.
The most ideal place to be would be to know what you essentially want to keep you going. Keeping in mind that there can't be too many 'essential things'. But that is not a one day exercise.
To hack Rumi...
We all will continue to drink from the wineglass until we break the wineglass. And fall toward the glassblower’s breath...
Yours sincerely
Alok
cheers to your words Alok and here is trying to "fall toward the glassblower’s breath..."...
ReplyDelete